Books
Foundations
Gifts & Giving
NonProfits
Public Commons
Social Ventures
Online
Home » NonProfits

Champagne Wishes and Caviar Dreams?

By Kate Golden on March 1, 2007No Comment

In Thursday’s New York Times, Stephanie Strom reports that out of 1,800 nonprofits studied by the I.R.S., nearly 600 reported payments to executives incorrectly on their tax forms.  This finding comes in the same week that American University announced that it is facing an I.R.S. investigation stemming from the exorbitant spending of ousted president Benjamin Ladner, a story following on the heels of Senator Grassley’s assertion, made Monday, that a top Smithsonian official squandered institutional resources on jet travel and entertainment expenses.  Is it any wonder that donors want to restrict their gifts

The study, the largest ever undertaken by the tax exempt division of the I.R.S., began in 2004 amid heightened scrutiny of the sector by both Congress and the media. 

Steven T. Miller at the I.R.S. said of their findings, “We found some problems.  Whether they were due to confusion, poor design of the tax forms used by these organizations or something more nefarious, I can’t tell you.”   Unfortunately, of course, it is the nefarious that makes the news.  And perhaps it is the nefarious that leads to inquiry and, ultimately, change. 

The compensation issue is a tricky one.  An organization must be able to attract, and retain, talented executives or it will likely flounder in the competitive landscape of today’s nonprofit sector.  Many nonprofits are offering attractive compensation packages, honestly and openly.  Miller explained, “…that in some cases where we found high compensation — and we did find it — the organization has done a good job of using comparables and establishing a procedure to determine it.”   

These recent reports of organizations with questionable spending practices should be counterbalanced with a report detailing those organizations who do pay their executives well, and who have a detailed rationale for doing so.  Learning from the good, instead of the nefarious, may lead to even greater change.

Share This Post
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [LinkedIn] [Twitter] [Email]

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Tags

#cgi2010 Allison Fine Barack Obama Beth Kanter Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Bill Clinton Blogs Case Foundation CauseWired Change.org Changing Our World Clinton Global Initiative Corporate Social Responsibility Disasters DonorsChoose Facebook Facebook Causes Flash Causes Fundraising Fundraising Nightmares Giving Pledge GlobalGiving Haiti Hillary Clinton Kiva Lilya Wagner Mario Morino Millennials Non-profit organization Nonprofit NonProfits Philanthropy Planned Giving Politics Ron Paul Skoll Social Actions Social Media Susan Carey Dempsey Susan Raymond Ph.D Tom Watson Twitter United Nations Women YouTube

Blogroll

Philanthropy News

Sites We Like

Copyright

onPhilanthropy and DotOrgJobs are published by CauseWired Communications, LLC - copyright 1999-2011, all rights reserved.

Webmaster